Settings8H · net · $10k
LanguageThe language of the site
FundingPeriod funding rates are shown in
UnitsPercent or basis points
CostsCount taker fees and slippage in Net
SizePosition per leg used for Net and slippage
ExchangesWhich exchanges to include everywhere
My profile →
My profile
Compare /

ApeX Omni vs Bitget

Bitget traded 7.3× ApeX Omni's 24-hour volume ($3.14B vs $429.0M).

vs
ApeX OmniDEX · ApeX L2Better on 3 of 10
Trade on ApeX Omni5% off fees
vs
BitgetCEXBetter on 7 of 10
Trade on Bitget

Head to head

the arrow points to the better figure
ApeX OmniBitget
Trading
$1,665BTC trade, $1M▶$1,289
$12.9MBTC book depth▶$53.8M
100xMax leverage▶150x
Size
$429.0MVolume 24h▶$3.14B
$415.3MVolume, 7-day average▶$7.97B
$154.1Mlongs + shortsOpen interest$9.00Bone side
$31.3MTVL—
Markets
126Markets▶862
40Stocks & RWA▶345
1hFunding paid every1h or 4h or 8h
+0.0005%BTC funding /8h+0.0072%
+0.324%BTC longs paid, 30d+0.556%
Access
$APEXToken$BGB
Not activeAirdrop—

Cost to trade BTC

ApeX Omni cheaper below $1M, Bitget from $1M
SizeApeX OmniBitget
$1k$1.0110.1 bp$1.2012.0 bp
$10k$10.4710.5 bp$12.0112.0 bp
$100k$10610.6 bp$12012.0 bp
$1M$1,66516.7 bp$1,28912.9 bp
$5M$37,89475.8 bp$8,10616.2 bp

ETH funding per day

pair page
Longs paid in 30 days: ApeX Omni +0.125% · Bitget +0.653%
ApeX OmniBitget

Size

daily, last year
Volume24h, each day
ApeX OmniBitget
Open interestat each day's close
ApeX OmniBitget
ApeX Omni's share of the twoby volume
ApeX Omni's share
TVLdeposits or pool
ApeX OmniBitget

Volume by asset class

last year
ApeX OmniCrypto 99% · Stocks 0.9% · Other RWA 0.2%
BitgetCrypto 86% · Stocks 11% · Commodities 3.0% · Other RWA 0.3%

On both: 121

funding /8h · Net 7d at $10k
AssetApeX OmniBitgetSpreadNet 7d
BTC+0.0005%+0.0072%+0.0067%−$17
ETH+0.0097%+0.0100%+0.0003%−$15
SOL−0.0129%−0.0029%+0.0100%+$6
XRP+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$25
LTC+0.0545%+0.0100%+0.0445%−$44
HYPE+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$28
ZEC+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$60
PAXG+0.0040%+0.0100%+0.0060%−$24
NEAR+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$53
ADA+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$48
BCH+0.0058%+0.0100%+0.0042%−$34
DOGE+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$50
BNB+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$30
XLM+0.0100%+0.0017%+0.0083%−$39
TRX+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$30
POL+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$81
PUMP+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$65
AAVE+0.0100%+0.0062%+0.0038%−$33
HBAR+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$52
JUP+0.0100%+0.0100%0.0000%−$95
Only on ApeX Omni: 5

APEX · USO · CASHCAT · HMSTR · MNT

Only on Bitget: 692

KORU · BTW · XAUT · SKHY · BGB · DOT · ANTHROPIC · FET · FF · TRUMP · 龙虾 · SOON · QNT · KAS · SHIB · ETC · ICP · GRASS · SP500 · XMR · OPENAI · TUT · ALGO · DASH · ZBT · SNXX · ETHFI · TQQQ · US · ATOM · SOXS · SAND · PI · PROM · VVV · EPIC · STRC · VET · APR · MUBARAK · AERO · ZAMA · NFLX · ZHIPU · TAG · XPD · NKE · AXS · STRK · BSB · MORPHO · RIVER · USDC · MANTA · TSM · DEXE · B2 · COTI · KITE · BR · and 632 more

Questions

Is ApeX Omni or Bitget cheaper to trade?

Opening and closing $10,000 of BTC with market orders costs $10.47 on ApeX Omni and $12.01 on Bitget right now, taker fee and order-book slippage together, so ApeX Omni is cheaper. Taker fees: 0.05% and 0.06%.

Which has more markets, ApeX Omni or Bitget?

ApeX Omni lists 126 active markets and Bitget 862; 121 assets trade on both, 39 of them stocks, commodities or other real-world assets.

Does ApeX Omni or Bitget require KYC?

ApeX Omni: No ID; not for the US or sanctioned countries. Bitget: KYC mandatory since Sep 2023; unverified accounts can only withdraw and close positions.

Can you arbitrage funding between ApeX Omni and Bitget?

Yes: 1 of the assets on both paid more in funding over the last 7 days than a $10k round trip on both costs. The best was SOL, long on ApeX Omni and short on Bitget, with $6 left after costs.

Which is bigger, ApeX Omni or Bitget?

24-hour volume: ApeX Omni $429.0M, Bitget $3.14B. Open interest as each reports it: $154.1M and $9.00B. ApeX Omni reports open interest as longs plus shorts, both sides of every position; Bitget reports one side. For the same positions ApeX Omni's figure reads about twice as large. TVL: $31.3M and none published.

More comparisons

all