Funding arb · Price arb / RWA
| Leg | Exchange | Price | Fund. /8h | Each payment | Next in | OI | Vol 24h | Lev | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LONG | 542.38 | +0.0220 | pay 0.0028% / 1h | 0m 10s | $6K | $213K | 10x | Long Injective | |
| SHORT | 543.01 | −0.0050 | pay 0.0050% / 8h | 6h 00m | $981K | $1.7M | — | Short BingX |
Price gap+0.117%91s
Funding gap−0.0270% /8h
Both sides work against this direction now: funding costs $8 a day on $10k and the gap is 3.419% under its 7d average. Swap the legs.
If you open now and hold
on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecastFunding+$15−0.0270% /8h now · paid +0.148% over the last 7D
Price—spread +0.117%91s now · prices read too far apart to compare
Costsdoesn’t fit$10k a leg is deeper than the books hold
Result, before costs—no pointsneeds both prices read together
The current funding rate is far below what this pair has been paying: over the last 7 days it paid +0.148% in total, about +0.0071%/8h on average.
Price and funding
1h · historyEntry / Exit
Price spread
Prices
Fundingper 8h
ENTRY / EXIT · 7D
Entry now—
Entry average—
Best entry—
Exit now—
Exit average—
Best exit—
Exit free—
PRICE SPREAD · 7D
Now+0.117%
Average—
Range—
Wider than now—
FUNDING SPREAD · 7D
Average /8h—
Highest—
Lowest—
Paid you—
Where the spread has been, last 7D▾
share of time at each level
Funding on every exchange
/8hDELL on 22 exchanges
lowest funding firstBefore you open
0 ok · 5 to watch- Problem: Doesn’t fit the books—$10k a leg is deeper than Injective’s order book right now.
- Note: Margin at max leverage$1,000 + —Injective 10x, BingX —. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
- Watch: Payment intervals differ1h / 8hPayments land at different times. Close right after the slower leg pays.Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: −$8.10Long Injective: 24 payments, −$6.60; short BingX: 3 payments, −$1.50.
- Watch: Prices read 91 s apart+0.117% vs +3.536%Part of this gap may be the market moving.
- Watch: Long leg is thinner$6K vs $981K OIInjective sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
- Note: No points program—Neither exchange runs points right now.
- Watch: KYCInjective No · BingX YesAdvanced KYC to deposit or trade; unverified accounts can only withdraw, up to 20,000 USDT a day. Rules vary by region.
Profit calculator
both legs, in and outPosition, each legHold forOrdersPrice spreadFunding rate
Funding earned+0.0071%/8h × 21 periods+$14.82
Price spreadprices read too far apart to compare—
Slippage, 4 ordersdoesn’t fit the book at $10k—
Fee Injective bp × 2 orders−$0.02
Fee BingX bp × 2 orders−$10.00
Net · 7 days · $10k—
doesn’t fit the books at $10kprice spread not counted: prices read too far apartCosts to cover—Break-even—
Slippage: Injective: live order book, 10 min ago; BingX: live order book, 3 min agoCost to enter
taker + slippage from mid, one sideBUY · LONGInjective370.07doesn’t fitdoesn’t fitdoesn’t fitdoesn’t fit
SELL · SHORTBingX0.096.0 bp−$612.2 bp−$12275.1 bp−$7,509518.1 bp−$259.0K
Closing costs about the same again.
| 09-18 17:43 | Avantis | Other | AI infra. $ARM — AGI CPU upside, or competing with the licensees who pay the royalties? $DELL — AI server winner, or custom racks eating the margin? $WDC — pricing power that's structurally re-rated, or peak-cycle earnings on a multiple that assumes it never breaks? $LITE — OCS and in-rack optics expanding the TAM, or a supply-constrained component vendor with three customers? $NBIS — Meta-scale neocloud winner, or thin-margin GPU landlord? $IREN — miner→AI cloud with real MW, or leveraged GPU financing? $BE — fuel cells unlocking AI power, or a multiple that needs a broken grid? @verantaxyz on X ↗ |
Avantis