Settings8H · net · $10k
LanguageThe language of the site
FundingPeriod funding rates are shown in
UnitsPercent or basis points
CostsCount taker fees and slippage in Net
SizePosition per leg used for Net and slippage
ExchangesWhich exchanges to include everywhere
My profile →
My profile
Backtest 30d
LegExchangePriceFund. /8hEach paymentNext inOIVol 24hLev
LONG279.62+0.0427pay 0.0427% / 8h2h 30m$934K$1.9M—Long BingX
SHORT279.41+0.0041get 0.0005% / 1h30m 46s$160K$190K10xShort Arcus5% off
Price gap−0.075%
Funding gap−0.0386% /8h

The gap pays +$2 on $10k if it goes back to its 7d average, but funding costs $12 a day and eats that in about 4 hours. At the last 7 days' pace that is about 13 hours.

If you open now and hold

on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecast
Funding−$27−0.0386% /8h now · paid −0.272% over the last 7D
Price+$2spread −0.075% now, avg −0.097% → +0.022% if it goes back
Costs−$360.359% of $10k · taker + slippage, in and out

Price and funding

1h · history
ENTRY / EXIT · 7D
Entry now—
Entry average—
Best entry—
Exit now—
Exit average—
Best exit—
Exit free—
PRICE SPREAD · 7D
Now−0.075%
Average—
Range—
Wider than now—
FUNDING SPREAD · 7D
Average /8h—
Highest—
Lowest—
Paid you—

Where the spread has been, last 7D

share of time at each level

Funding on every exchange

/8h

BE on 23 exchanges

lowest funding first

Before you open

2 ok · 3 to watch
  • OK: Fits both order books10.4 / 7.8 bp
    Entry at $10k a leg, taker fee + slippage. Closing costs about the same.
  • Note: Margin at max leverage— + $1,000
    BingX —, Arcus 10x. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
  • Watch: Payment intervals differ8h / 1h
    Payments land at different times. Close right after the slower leg pays.
    Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: −$11.59Long BingX: 3 payments, −$12.81; short Arcus: 24 payments, +$1.22.
  • OK: Entry gap works for you−0.075% vs −0.097%
    You short the dearer leg. If the gap goes back to average, the short gains.
  • Watch: Short leg is thinner$160K vs $934K OI
    Arcus sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
  • Note: No points program—
    Neither exchange runs points right now.
  • Watch: KYCBingX Yes · Arcus No
    Advanced KYC to deposit or trade; unverified accounts can only withdraw, up to 20,000 USDT a day. Rules vary by region.

Profit calculator

both legs, in and out
Position, each leg
Hold for
Orders
Price spread
Funding rate
Funding earned−0.0130%/8h × 21 periods−$27.23
Price spread−0.075% → −0.097% (7d avg)+$2.17
Slippage, 4 orderslive order books−$21.39
Fee BingX bp × 2 orders−$10.00
Fee Arcus bp × 2 orders−$4.50
Net · 7 days · $10k−$60.96
Costs to cover0.359%Break-evennever at this rate
Slippage: BingX: live order book, 3 min ago; Arcus: live order book, 9 min ago

Cost to enter

taker + slippage from mid, one side
BUY · LONGBingX0.1810.4 bp−$1018.6 bp−$18662.3 bp−$6,234377.1 bp−$188.5K
SELL · SHORTArcus3.777.8 bp−$811.9 bp−$119doesn’t fitdoesn’t fit

Closing costs about the same again.

Alert

BE news

posts that mention BE or Bloom Energy, from every exchangeSearch all news →
09-29 15:00Vest MarketsOther$BE is up around 13% on the session, recovering Monday's 9% drop with the fuel cell group rebounding. Jefferies raised its price target on the shares to $264 from $229 today, keeping a Hold rating on the growth outlook. The pipeline feeding the New Mexico campus has slipped to February 2027, with Bloom taking another 158,000 square feet at its Fremont plant. @VestExchange on X ↗
09-25 16:30Vest MarketsOtherBloom Energy's Project Jupiter agreement is drawing buyers after Thursday's slide, with $BE up close to 9% on today's session. The notice went to the developer, a Blue Owl unit building the New Mexico campus for OpenAI, and allows deferred payments if the campus slips past 2028. Bloom joined the S&P 500 this month and has reported second-quarter revenue growth of 165.5%. @VestExchange on X ↗
09-21 13:35gTrade (Gains Network)Listingnew market BE/USD ($BE) seen by our collector
09-18 17:43AvantisOtherAI infra. $ARM — AGI CPU upside, or competing with the licensees who pay the royalties? $DELL — AI server winner, or custom racks eating the margin? $WDC — pricing power that's structurally re-rated, or peak-cycle earnings on a multiple that assumes it never breaks? $LITE — OCS and in-rack optics expanding the TAM, or a supply-constrained component vendor with three customers? $NBIS — Meta-scale neocloud winner, or thin-margin GPU landlord? $IREN — miner→AI cloud with real MW, or leveraged GPU financing? $BE — fuel cells unlocking AI power, or a multiple that needs a broken grid? @verantaxyz on X ↗