ORCL

腿	交易所	价格	费率 /8h	每次结算	距下次结算	OI	24h 成交量	杠杆
做多	Variational OmniORCL	131.53	0	0.0000% / 8h	5h 44m	$1.2M	$41K	20x	做多 Variational Omni+15% 积分
做空	DeribitORCL_USDC-PERPETUAL	131.68	−0.0164	支付 0.0020% / 1h	44m 15s	$155K	$220K	10x	做空 Deribit

价差+0.112%

资金费率差−0.0164% /8h

若价差回到其 7 日均值，$10k 仓位可得 +$17，但每天要支付 $5 资金费，约 3.6 天就会耗尽这部分收益。

现在开仓并持有

每条腿 $10k · 为过去 7D 的实际数据，并非预测

资金费率+$4当前 −0.0164% /8h · 过去 7D 已结算 +0.043%

价格+$17当前价差 +0.112%，均值 −0.063% → 若回归可得 +0.175%

成本−$43$10k 的 0.428% · 吃单手续费 + 滑点，含开仓和平仓

结果−$21−0.21%+ 积分 / 潜在空投Variational Omni: 积分 · 刷积分看板过去 7D 逐小时的实际收益 → 回测

价格与资金费率

1h · 历史数据

开仓 / 平仓

价差

价格

资金费率每 8 小时

开仓 / 平仓 · 7D

当前开仓—

开仓均值—

最佳开仓—

当前平仓—

平仓均值—

最佳平仓—

免费平仓—

价差 · 7D

当前+0.112%

平均—

区间—

比当前更宽—

资金费率差 · 7D

平均 /8h—

最高—

最低—

收到资金费—

过去 7D 的价差分布

各水平所占的时间比例

所有交易所的资金费率

/8h

33 家交易所的 ORCL

资金费率从低到高

开仓前检查

3 项正常 · 3 项需留意

正常: 两边订单簿均可容纳13.6 / 5.7 bp
单腿 $10k 的开仓成本，含吃单手续费和滑点。平仓成本大致相同。
说明: 最高杠杆下的保证金$500 + $1,000
Variational Omni 20x，Deribit 10x。建议准备约 2 倍的保证金，以免行情剧烈波动时其中一条腿被强平。
需留意: 结算周期不同8h / 1h
两条腿的结算时间不同。请在周期较长的那条腿结算后立即平仓。
按当前费率，每条腿 $10k，未来 24 小时：−$4.91做多 Variational Omni：3 次结算，$0.00；做空 Deribit：24 次结算，−$4.91。
正常: 开仓价差对你有利+0.112% vs −0.063%
你做空的是价格较高的那条腿。若价差回到均值，空头获利。
需留意: 空头腿深度较薄$155K vs $1.2M OI
平仓成本取决于 Deribit。平仓前请先查看其订单簿。
正常: 有一条腿可赚积分Variational Omni 积分
在此产生的成交量计入积分计划。
需留意: KYCVariational Omni 无需 · Deribit 需要
任何入金前均需提供身份证明、地址证明和财务状况资料；对美国、加拿大、日本及英国散户客户不开放。

收益计算器

两条腿，含开仓和平仓

每条腿仓位

持有时间

订单类型

价差

资金费率

资金费收益+0.0021%/8h × 21 个周期+$4.31

价差+0.112% → −0.063%（7 日均值）+$17.48

滑点，4 笔订单实时订单簿−$35.84

Variational Omni 手续费 bp × 2 笔订单$0.00

Deribit 手续费 bp × 2 笔订单−$7.00

净收益 · 7 天 · $10k−$21.04

需覆盖的成本0.428%回本时间41.1 天

滑点：Variational Omni：RFQ 报价，4 分钟前；Deribit：实时订单簿，57 分钟前

开仓成本

吃单手续费 + 相对中间价的滑点，单边

买入 · 做多Variational Omni3.9513.6 bp−$1422.9 bp−$229容纳不下容纳不下

卖出 · 做空Deribit0.385.7 bp−$68.5 bp−$85容纳不下容纳不下

平仓还需再付大致相同的成本。

ORCL 资讯

各交易所提到 ORCL 或 Oracle 的公告搜索全部资讯 →

10-27 16:55	Kalshi	其他	JUST IN: Oracle to offer Google TPUs in its cloud for the first time X 上的 @Kalshi ↗
10-27 06:49	Hyperliquid	其他	As a reminder, hyperps do not rely on any external data for the oracle price. Hyperps trade like perpetual contracts that users are familiar with, but do not require an external spot or index oracle price. Instead, the funding rate is determined relative to a moving average of the hyperp mark price. This makes the hyperp price more stable and less susceptible to manipulation, unlike usual pre-launch futures. When trading hyperps, funding rates are important to consider. If there is heavy price momentum in one direction, funding will heavily incentivize positions in the opposite direction for the next eight hours. As always, be sure to understand the contract before trading. Trading is on low leverage and isolated margin only. Beware of low liquidity, high volatility, potentially extreme funding, and increased liquidation risk. Note: XTEN-USDC will convert to a vanilla perp upon CEX listing. See Docs for more. XTEN-USDC is a hyperp contract that poses higher than normal risk. Do not trade contracts you are unfamiliar with and do not understand the risks for. Read the Docs to learn more about the hyperp mechanism and how it differs from vanilla perps. NFA. X 上的 @HyperliquidX ↗
10-25 09:09	AZverse	上线	新市场 orcl_usdt ($ORCL) 由我们的采集程序发现
10-23 04:20	tradeXYZ	其他	JIO references 1 equity share of Jio Platforms Limited, quoted in USD. JIO is currently a pre-IPO market reflecting the anticipated share price; it is expected to convert to a standard XYZ perpetual upon the IPO. After the IPO, the oracle will convert the underlying stock's INR price to USD at the prevailing USD/INR FX rate. Jio Platforms provides digital connectivity and digital services in India. X 上的 @tradexyz ↗
10-19 22:35	Paragon	上线	para:PAPER has been halted and settled. The @papertrade_xyz launch plan, published October 1, included a phase in which PAPER would become transferable. para:PAPER was listed as a pre-launch perp on that basis, with the expectation that it would convert to a standard perp once a spot market became available. Papertrade announced today that they do not intend to make $PAPER transferable. The pre-launch perp relied on the expectation that its underlying will eventually trade. Traders took positions based on a public roadmap that supported that expectation. With it removed, there is no future spot price for the market to converge to. We halted para at 22:31:15 UTC immediately following the announcement rather than schedule a later closure. This established a common cutoff for all open positions and a consistent basis for settlement, limiting the impact of trading around the announcement. All open positions were settled at $0.026296, calculated as the time-weighted average oracle price over the hour ending at the halt, using the same one-hour averaging window as Hyperliquid’s validator-led delistings for HyperCore perps. All open orders were cancelled. Remaining margin has been released, and realized PnL is reflected in account balances. No action is required from traders. Should PAPER’s transferability plans change, we will review whether the market can be unhalted. X 上的 @tradeparagon ↗
10-18 14:56	Injective	代币	This month, we released the new Injective Whitepaper, our first full rewrite since the original paper in December 2018. Back then we described a front-running-resistant exchange protocol on Ethereum. Injective is now a layer-1 built for institutional finance and tokenization, and the new paper covers how the entire chain works to issue real-world assets and make them usable across markets, apps and AI agents. What's inside: → Native RWA tokenization with role-based permissions over mint, send, receive and burn, plus receive hooks and sealable namespaces → iAssets, stablecoin-margined derivatives priced by oracles that track external assets without wrapping or pre-funding → A fully onchain orderbook that runs a sealed batch auction every block at one clearing price, so front-running and ordering MEV don't work → BFT consensus with a >2/3 commit threshold and deterministic finality in ~600ms → EVM and WASM sharing one state, with the MultiVM Token Standard keeping a single balance per asset that Solidity reads through precompiles → Perps with time-weighted funding, initial and maintenance margin checks, reduce-only liquidations and insurance funds → AI agents trading tokenized assets through MCP servers, policy-bounded signing and x402 payments in USDC → Onchain protocol revenue going to the Community BuyBack for $INJ every month with deflationary mechanisms built in We also formalized the mathematical reasoning behind each of these parameters, including the consensus threshold, batch clearing rule, oracle accounting, margin checks, permission model and dynamic issuance. Full paper below 👇 X 上的 @injective ↗