资金费率套利 · 价差套利 / 加密货币
BTC
BTC 全部市场 →| 腿 | 交易所 | 价格 | 费率 /8h | 每次结算 | 距下次结算 | OI | 24h 成交量 | 杠杆 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 做多 | 75,925.1 | +0.0100 | 支付 0.0013% / 1h | 2m 39s | $121.7M | $293.0M | 100x | 做多 ApeX Omni减 5% | |
| 做空 | 75,872.5 | +0.0100 | 收取 0.0013% / 1h | 2m 39s | $3.9M | $2.6M | 50x | 做空 Vest Markets+5% 积分 |
价差−0.069%60s
资金费率差0.0000% /8h
资金费率 ≈ 0,价差处于其 7 日均值:目前没有可捕捉的收益。
现在开仓并持有
每条腿 $10k · 为过去 7D 的实际数据,并非预测资金费率−$54当前 0.0000% /8h · 过去 7D 已结算 −0.539%
价格—当前价差 −0.069%60s · 两个价格读取时间相差过大,无法比较
成本无数据Vest Markets 没有订单簿数据
价格与资金费率
1h · 历史数据开仓 / 平仓
价差
价格
资金费率每 8 小时
开仓 / 平仓 · 7D
当前开仓—
开仓均值—
最佳开仓—
当前平仓—
平仓均值—
最佳平仓—
免费平仓—
价差 · 7D
当前−0.069%
平均—
区间—
比当前更宽—
资金费率差 · 7D
平均 /8h—
最高—
最低—
收到资金费—
过去 7D 的价差分布▾
各水平所占的时间比例
所有交易所的资金费率
/8h55 家交易所的 BTC
资金费率从低到高开仓前检查
3 项正常 · 2 项需留意- 说明: 订单簿未知—Vest Markets 没有订单簿样本:未计入其滑点。
- 说明: 最高杠杆下的保证金$100 + $200ApeX Omni 100x,Vest Markets 50x。建议准备约 2 倍的保证金,以免行情剧烈波动时其中一条腿被强平。
- 正常: 结算周期相同1h / 1h两条腿同时结算。按当前费率,每条腿 $10k,未来 24 小时:$0.00做多 ApeX Omni:24 次结算,−$3.00;做空 Vest Markets:24 次结算,+$3.00。
- 需留意: 价格读取时间相差 60 秒−0.069% vs −0.059%这一价差中有一部分可能来自行情变动。
- 需留意: 空头腿深度较薄$3.9M vs $121.7M OI平仓成本取决于 Vest Markets。平仓前请先查看其订单簿。
- 正常: 有一条腿可赚积分Vest Markets 积分在此产生的成交量计入积分计划。
- 正常: 两条腿均无需 KYCApeX Omni 无需 · Vest Markets 无需两家交易所均无需身份验证即可交易。
收益计算器
两条腿,含开仓和平仓每条腿仓位持有时间订单类型价差资金费率
资金费收益−0.0257%/8h × 21 个周期−$53.90
价差两个价格读取时间相差过大,无法比较—
滑点,4 笔订单Vest Markets 无数据—
ApeX Omni 手续费 bp × 2 笔订单−$10.00
Vest Markets 手续费 bp × 2 笔订单−$2.00
净收益(仅扣手续费) · 7 天 · $10k−$65.90
未计入价差:两个价格读取时间相差过大需覆盖的成本0.120%回本时间按此费率无法回本
滑点:ApeX Omni:实时订单簿,4 分钟前;Vest Markets:没有订单簿样本开仓成本
吃单手续费 + 相对中间价的滑点,单边买入 · 做多ApeX Omni1.606.6 bp−$76.6 bp−$667.5 bp−$74736.6 bp−$18.3K
卖出 · 做空Vest Markets—————
平仓还需再付大致相同的成本。
Vest Markets:无数据。
BTC 资讯
各交易所提到 BTC 的公告| 11-05 15:14 | Injective | 其他 | @Nasdaq @BitGo 4/ $INJ now joins $BTC, $ETH and $SOL among the few major crypto assets with a dedicated U.S. ETF. A major step in bringing Injective to traditional capital markets. X 上的 @injective ↗ |
| 11-05 15:09 | RISEx | 其他 | Since August, trading on RISEx has become much cheaper with far less slippage; the pool is being adjusted to support these improvements. $100K orders are cheaper across $BTC, $ETH, $XAU, $SPY and $QQQ. Index ETFs improved most, about 85% cheaper, with gold about 65%. $200K $SPY and $QQQ orders couldn’t reliably fill within 20 bps in August. By October, they were closer to 2 bps. Your size continues to add depth to the book, and every large order brings in more liquidity and raises the bar for what RISEx has to deliver. RISEx is still the only venue that pays slippage back. Keep sizing up. X 上的 @risextrade ↗ |
| 11-05 13:48 | Pacifica | 其他 | How does BTC’s performance compare to ETH and SOL? With Neptune, you’ll be able to turn that question into a dashboard, showing how each asset performed, how far it fell from its highs, and how closely their prices moved together. Choose the assets and timeframe in plain language, and explore the results within your workspace. X 上的 @pacifica_fi ↗ |
| 11-05 12:17 | Phemex | 其他 | ethereum:native +7.4%. $BTC +4.8%. When risk is back on, which one do you reach for first? 👉 ethereum:native/USDT: X 上的 @Phemex_official ↗ |
| 11-05 12:16 | Phemex | 其他 | BTC ETFs just flipped: ~$276M net inflow in one day. Real demand or short covering? 🏦 / 🔄 👉 ethereum:native/USDT: X 上的 @Phemex_official ↗ |
| 11-05 09:55 | Phemex | 其他 | $BTC dipped to ~$75.6K overnight. Reclaimed $80K the same day. Caught the dip 🟢 or bought the reclaim 🔴? 👉 X 上的 @Phemex_official ↗ |

Injective
RISEx
Pacifica
Phemex