DRAM

Leg	Exchange	Price	Fund. /8h	Each payment	Next in	OI	Vol 24h	Lev
LONG	TxFlowDRAM-USDC	47.600	+0.0100	pay 0.0013% / 1h	45m 57s	$32K	$63K	15x	Long TxFlow5% off
SHORT	AZversedram_usdt	47.670	+0.0099	get 0.0012% / 1h	45m 57s	$539K	$161K	—	Short AZverse

Price gap+0.147%

Funding gap−0.0001% /8h

Funding is ≈ 0, so this is a price-spread trade: +$15 on $10k if the gap goes back to zero (no 7-day history yet).

If you open now and hold

on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecast

Funding—−0.0001% /8h now · no funding history yet

Price—spread +0.147% now · no price history on both exchanges yet

Costsno datano order book for TxFlow and AZverse

Result, before costs—+ Points / potential airdropTxFlow: points · farm boardneeds funding history

Price and funding

1h · history

Entry / Exit

Price spread

Prices

Fundingper 8h

ENTRY / EXIT · 7D

Entry now—

Entry average—

Best entry—

Exit now—

Exit average—

Best exit—

Exit free—

PRICE SPREAD · 7D

Now+0.147%

Average—

Range—

Wider than now—

FUNDING SPREAD · 7D

Average /8h—

Highest—

Lowest—

Paid you—

Where the spread has been, last 7D

share of time at each level

Funding on every exchange

/8h

DRAM on 37 exchanges

lowest funding first

Before you open

3 ok · 1 to watch

Note: Order book unknown—
No order-book sample for TxFlow and AZverse: its slippage is not counted.
Note: Margin at max leverage$667 + —
TxFlow 15x, AZverse —. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
OK: Same payment interval1h / 1h
Both legs pay at the same time.
Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: −$0.03Long TxFlow: 24 payments, −$3.00; short AZverse: 24 payments, +$2.97.
Note: No 7-day spread history+0.147%
The gap cannot be compared with its average yet.
Watch: Long leg is thinner$32K vs $539K OI
TxFlow sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
OK: Points on a legTxFlow points
Volume here counts toward the points program.
OK: No KYC on either legTxFlow No · AZverse No
Both exchanges let you trade without ID.

Profit calculator

both legs, in and out

Position, each leg

Hold for

Orders

Price spread

Funding rate

Funding earnedno history yet: current rate−$0.24

Price spread+0.147% → 0+$14.71

Slippage, 4 ordersno data for TxFlow and AZverse—

Fee TxFlow bp × 2 orders−$9.00

Fee AZverse bp × 2 orders−$12.00

Net, fees only · 7 days · $10k−$6.53

Costs to cover0.210%Break-evennever at this rate

Slippage: TxFlow: no order-book sample; AZverse: no order-book sample

Cost to enter

taker + slippage from mid, one side

BUY · LONGTxFlow—————

SELL · SHORTAZverse—————

Closing costs about the same again.
TxFlow and AZverse: no data.

DRAM news

posts that mention DRAM, from every exchangeSearch all news →

10-22 01:30	Kalshi	Other	FUN FACT: Micron has increased the amount of DRAM produced per wafer by about 400x over the past 30 years @Kalshi on X ↗
10-18 00:45	Arcus	Other	This weekend, memory stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through the wick without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-18 00:40	Arcus	Other	This weekend, AI infrastructure stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-16 15:31	Vest Markets	Other	US-listed memory shares are extending a week-long selloff, with $SKHY down around 5% on the session. Over $700 billion in global memory-chip market value has been erased since October 10, when China's CXMT detailed a denser 4F2 DRAM design. Goldman flagged $SKHY and Samsung today as attractive risk/reward, arguing the market overestimated China's tech gap. @VestExchange on X ↗
10-15 01:05	edgeX	Listing	DRAMUSDC no longer reported ($DRAM) seen by our collector
10-12 15:30	Vest Markets	Other	Memory names are under pressure on the session, with $MU down around 4% and $SNDK down around 6.5%. Chinese DRAM maker CXMT said over the weekend it made key progress on a denser 4F² cell design, with a DDR5 server product planned by end-2026. Trade $MU, $SNDK and broader memory volatility with a Vest Capital funded account and access up to $25k in trading capital. @VestExchange on X ↗