DRAM

Leg	Exchange	Price	Fund. /8h	Each payment	Next in	OI	Vol 24h	Lev
LONG	AZversedram_usdt	47.660	+0.0309	pay 0.0039% / 1h	38m 00s	$539K	$162K	—	Long AZverse
SHORT	tradeXYZxyz:DRAM	47.573	+0.0662	get 0.0083% / 1h	38m 00s	$69.9M	$8.9M	20x	Short tradeXYZ

Price gap−0.183%

Funding gap+0.0353% /8h

Funding trade: +$11 a day on $10k at the current rate, before costs. The price gap is at its 7d average.

If you open now and hold

on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecast

Funding−$1+0.0353% /8h now · paid −0.010% over the last 16 hours (all we have)

Price+$1spread −0.183% now, avg −0.197% → +0.014% if it goes back

Costsno datano order book for AZverse

Result, before costs$00.00%+ Points / potential airdroptradeXYZ: points · farm boardcosts unknown: no order book for AZverse · What the last 7D really paid, hour by hour → backtest

The current funding rate is far above what this pair has been paying: over the last 16 hours it paid −0.010% in total, about −0.0048%/8h on average.

Price and funding

1h · history

Entry / Exit

Price spread

Prices

Fundingper 8h

ENTRY / EXIT · 7D

Entry now—

Entry average—

Best entry—

Exit now—

Exit average—

Best exit—

Exit free—

PRICE SPREAD · 7D

Now−0.183%

Average—

Range—

Wider than now—

FUNDING SPREAD · 7D

Average /8h—

Highest—

Lowest—

Paid you—

Where the spread has been, last 7D

share of time at each level

Funding on every exchange

/8h

DRAM on 37 exchanges

lowest funding first

Before you open

3 ok · 1 to watch

Note: Order book unknown—
No order-book sample for AZverse: its slippage is not counted.
Note: Margin at max leverage— + $500
AZverse —, tradeXYZ 20x. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
OK: Same payment interval1h / 1h
Both legs pay at the same time.
Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: +$10.60Long AZverse: 24 payments, −$9.26; short tradeXYZ: 24 payments, +$19.86.
Note: Gap at its usual level−0.183% vs −0.197%
The price leg adds little either way.
Watch: Long leg is thinner$539K vs $69.9M OI
AZverse sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
OK: Points on a legtradeXYZ points
Volume here counts toward the points program.
OK: No KYC on either legAZverse No · tradeXYZ No
Both exchanges let you trade without ID.

Profit calculator

both legs, in and out

Position, each leg

Hold for

Orders

Price spread

Funding rate

Funding earned−0.0048%/8h × 21 periods−$10.12

Price spread−0.183% → −0.197% (7d avg)+$1.40

Slippage, 4 ordersno data for AZverse—

Fee AZverse bp × 2 orders−$12.00

Fee tradeXYZ bp × 2 orders−$1.80

Net, fees only · 7 days · $10k−$22.52

Costs to cover0.138%Break-evennever at this rate

Slippage: AZverse: no order-book sample; tradeXYZ: live order book, 6 min ago

Cost to enter

taker + slippage from mid, one side

BUY · LONGAZverse—————

SELL · SHORTtradeXYZ0.632.9 bp−$35.1 bp−$5118.3 bp−$1,830129.0 bp−$64.5K

Closing costs about the same again.
AZverse: no data.

DRAM news

posts that mention DRAM, from every exchangeSearch all news →

10-22 01:30	Kalshi	Other	FUN FACT: Micron has increased the amount of DRAM produced per wafer by about 400x over the past 30 years @Kalshi on X ↗
10-18 00:45	Arcus	Other	This weekend, memory stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through the wick without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-18 00:40	Arcus	Other	This weekend, AI infrastructure stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-16 15:31	Vest Markets	Other	US-listed memory shares are extending a week-long selloff, with $SKHY down around 5% on the session. Over $700 billion in global memory-chip market value has been erased since October 10, when China's CXMT detailed a denser 4F2 DRAM design. Goldman flagged $SKHY and Samsung today as attractive risk/reward, arguing the market overestimated China's tech gap. @VestExchange on X ↗
10-15 01:05	edgeX	Listing	DRAMUSDC no longer reported ($DRAM) seen by our collector
10-12 15:30	Vest Markets	Other	Memory names are under pressure on the session, with $MU down around 4% and $SNDK down around 6.5%. Chinese DRAM maker CXMT said over the weekend it made key progress on a denser 4F² cell design, with a DDR5 server product planned by end-2026. Trade $MU, $SNDK and broader memory volatility with a Vest Capital funded account and access up to $25k in trading capital. @VestExchange on X ↗