Settings8H · net · $10k
LanguageThe language of the site
ThemeDark, or a soft blue-grey
FundingPeriod funding rates are shown in
UnitsPercent or basis points
CostsCount taker fees and slippage in Net
SizePosition per leg used for Net and slippage
ExchangesWhich exchanges to include everywhere
My profile →
My profile
Backtest 30d
LegExchangePriceFund. /8hEach paymentNext inOIVol 24hLev
LONG47.270−0.0180get 0.0023% / 1h12m 00s$534K$161K—Long AZverse
SHORT47.291−0.0231pay 0.0231% / 8h7h 12m$24K$183K10xShort GRVT
Price gap+0.045%61s
Funding gap−0.0051% /8h

The gap pays +$3 on $10k if it goes back to its 7d average, but funding costs $2 a day and eats that in about 2.3 days. At the last 7 days' pace that is about 12 hours.

If you open now and hold

on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecast
Funding−$6−0.0051% /8h now · paid −0.058% over the last 21 hours (all we have)
Price—spread +0.045%61s now · prices read too far apart to compare
Costsno datano order book for AZverse
Result, before costs—+ Points / potential airdropGRVT: points · farm boardneeds both prices read together

Price and funding

1h · history
ENTRY / EXIT · 7D
Entry now—
Entry average—
Best entry—
Exit now—
Exit average—
Best exit—
Exit free—
PRICE SPREAD · 7D
Now+0.045%
Average—
Range—
Wider than now—
FUNDING SPREAD · 7D
Average /8h—
Highest—
Lowest—
Paid you—

Where the spread has been, last 7D

share of time at each level

Funding on every exchange

/8h

DRAM on 37 exchanges

lowest funding first

Before you open

2 ok · 3 to watch
  • Note: Order book unknown—
    No order-book sample for AZverse: its slippage is not counted.
  • Note: Margin at max leverage— + $1,000
    AZverse —, GRVT 10x. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
  • Watch: Payment intervals differ1h / 8h
    Payments land at different times. Close right after the slower leg pays.
    Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: −$1.52Long AZverse: 24 payments, +$5.41; short GRVT: 3 payments, −$6.93.
  • Watch: Prices read 61 s apart+0.045% vs +0.011%
    Part of this gap may be the market moving.
  • Watch: Short leg is thinner$24K vs $534K OI
    GRVT sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
  • OK: Points on a legGRVT points
    Volume here counts toward the points program.
  • OK: No KYC on either legAZverse No · GRVT No
    Both exchanges let you trade without ID.

Profit calculator

both legs, in and out
Position, each leg
Hold for
Orders
Price spread
Funding rate
Funding earned−0.0225%/8h × 21 periods−$47.26
Price spreadprices read too far apart to compare—
Slippage, 4 ordersno data for AZverse—
Fee AZverse bp × 2 orders−$12.00
Fee GRVT bp × 2 orders−$9.00
Net, fees only · 7 days · $10k−$68.26
price spread not counted: prices read too far apart
Costs to cover0.210%Break-evennever at this rate
Slippage: AZverse: no order-book sample; GRVT: live order book, 21 min ago

Cost to enter

taker + slippage from mid, one side
BUY · LONGAZverse—————
SELL · SHORTGRVT2.119.4 bp−$922.0 bp−$220doesn’t fitdoesn’t fit

Closing costs about the same again.
AZverse: no data.

Alert

DRAM news

posts that mention DRAM, from every exchangeSearch all news →
10-22 01:30KalshiOtherFUN FACT: Micron has increased the amount of DRAM produced per wafer by about 400x over the past 30 years @Kalshi on X ↗
10-18 00:45ArcusOtherThis weekend, memory stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through the wick without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-18 00:40ArcusOtherThis weekend, AI infrastructure stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗
10-16 15:31Vest MarketsOtherUS-listed memory shares are extending a week-long selloff, with $SKHY down around 5% on the session. Over $700 billion in global memory-chip market value has been erased since October 10, when China's CXMT detailed a denser 4F2 DRAM design. Goldman flagged $SKHY and Samsung today as attractive risk/reward, arguing the market overestimated China's tech gap. @VestExchange on X ↗
10-15 01:05edgeXListingDRAMUSDC no longer reported ($DRAM) seen by our collector
10-12 15:30Vest MarketsOtherMemory names are under pressure on the session, with $MU down around 4% and $SNDK down around 6.5%. Chinese DRAM maker CXMT said over the weekend it made key progress on a denser 4F² cell design, with a DDR5 server product planned by end-2026. Trade $MU, $SNDK and broader memory volatility with a Vest Capital funded account and access up to $25k in trading capital. @VestExchange on X ↗