CRWV

Leg	Exchange	Price	Fund. /8h	Each payment	Next in	OI	Vol 24h	Lev
LONG	AsterCRWVUSDT	54.552	0	0.0000% / 8h	2h 12m	$98K	$68K	20x	Long Aster≤10% back
SHORT	AZversecrwv_usdt	54.560	+0.0051	get 0.0006% / 1h	12m 06s	$43K	$68K	—	Short AZverse

Price gap+0.014%

Funding gap+0.0051% /8h

Funding trade: +$2 a day on $10k at the current rate, before costs. The price gap is at zero (no 7-day history yet).

If you open now and hold

on $10k a leg · figures of the last 7D, not a forecast

Funding—+0.0051% /8h now · no funding history yet

Price—spread +0.014% now · no price history on both exchanges yet

Costsno datano order book for Aster and AZverse

Result, before costs—+ Points / potential airdropAster: Stage 5 · farm boardneeds funding history

Price and funding

1h · history

Entry / Exit

Price spread

Prices

Fundingper 8h

ENTRY / EXIT · 7D

Entry now—

Entry average—

Best entry—

Exit now—

Exit average—

Best exit—

Exit free—

PRICE SPREAD · 7D

Now+0.014%

Average—

Range—

Wider than now—

FUNDING SPREAD · 7D

Average /8h—

Highest—

Lowest—

Paid you—

Where the spread has been, last 7D

share of time at each level

Funding on every exchange

/8h

CRWV on 30 exchanges

lowest funding first

Before you open

2 ok · 2 to watch

Note: Order book unknown—
No order-book sample for Aster and AZverse: its slippage is not counted.
Note: Margin at max leverage$500 + —
Aster 20x, AZverse —. Keep about 2× this so a sharp move doesn’t liquidate one leg.
Watch: Payment intervals differ8h / 1h
Payments land at different times. Close right after the slower leg pays.
Next 24h at the current rates, on $10k a leg: +$1.52Long Aster: 3 payments, $0.00; short AZverse: 24 payments, +$1.52.
Note: No 7-day spread history+0.014%
The gap cannot be compared with its average yet.
Watch: Short leg is thinner$43K vs $98K OI
AZverse sets your exit cost. Check its book before closing.
OK: Points on a legAster Stage 5
Volume here counts toward the points program.
OK: No KYC on either legAster No · AZverse No
Both exchanges let you trade without ID.

Profit calculator

both legs, in and out

Position, each leg

Hold for

Orders

Price spread

Funding rate

Funding earnedno history yet: current rate+$10.65

Price spread+0.014% → 0+$1.44

Slippage, 4 ordersno data for Aster and AZverse—

Fee Aster bp × 2 orders−$8.00

Fee AZverse bp × 2 orders−$12.00

Net, fees only · 7 days · $10k−$7.91

Costs to cover0.200%Break-even12.2 days

Slippage: Aster: no order-book sample; AZverse: no order-book sample

Cost to enter

taker + slippage from mid, one side

BUY · LONGAster—————

SELL · SHORTAZverse—————

Closing costs about the same again.
Aster and AZverse: no data.

CRWV news

posts that mention CRWV or CoreWeave, from every exchangeSearch all news →

10-25 09:09	AZverse	Listing	new market crwv_usdt ($CRWV) seen by our collector
10-21 14:38	RISEx	Listing	$CRWV is now live on RISEx, up to 10x. The read: CoreWeave rents NVIDIA GPUs to big tech. Meta alone is a $21B customer, and it will report after the close today. If Meta keeps spending, the AI build-out keeps getting funded. Otherwise, CRWV is likely to feel it first. @risextrade on X ↗
10-21 08:06	RISEx	Listing	new market CRWV/USDC ($CRWV) seen by our collector
10-20 13:30	Vest Markets	Other	Into the open, $CRWV is down around 3%, trading near the 52-week low it touched on Monday. HSBC estimates an average return on invested capital of 8.9% through 2030, below its cost of borrowing, against more than $51 billion in debt. Trade $CRWV volatility with a Vest Capital funded account and access up to $25k in trading capital. @VestExchange on X ↗
10-19 23:30	Kalshi	Other	JUST IN: Goldman Sachs upgrades CoreWeave to Buy @Kalshi on X ↗
10-18 00:45	Arcus	Other	This weekend, memory stocks swept ~7% in minutes on perp markets, on no news, then bounced most of the way back. On Arcus, price bands held the move. Outside regular trading hours, perps trading and the mark price are constrained to a range around the last regular-hours price. The range widens only if sustained pressure builds - so a flash wick in thin weekend liquidity can't instantly mark positions down. The result on Saturday: 44.4k orders were rejected at the band floor, and 98% of open positions on SKHY, SNDK, MU, DRAM, CRWV, and BE made it through the wick without being liquidated. Price bands don't make liquidation impossible - a real, sustained move will still move the mark. They exist so you aren't liquidated by ten minutes of thin liquidity. How off-hours protection works: @arcus_xyz on X ↗