| 레그 | 거래소 | 가격 | 펀딩비 /8h | 회당 정산 | 다음 정산까지 | OI | 24h 거래량 | 레버 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 롱 | 131.86 | 0 | 0.0000% / 8h | 4h 41m | $5.1M | $1.1M | 100x | MEXC 롱 | |
| 숏 | 132.06 | 0 | 0.0000% / 8h | 4h 41m | $2K | $129K | 10x | GRVT 숏 |
가격 스프레드+0.153%
펀딩비 스프레드0.0000% /8h
펀딩비가 ≈ 0이므로 가격 스프레드 거래입니다. 스프레드가 7일 평균으로 돌아가면 $10k 기준 +$15입니다.
지금 진입해 보유할 기간
레그당 $10k · 최근 7D의 실제 수치이며 예측이 아님펀딩비−$4현재 0.0000% /8h · 최근 7D 정산 −0.038%
가격+$15현재 스프레드 +0.153%, 평균 +0.004% → 되돌아가면 +0.150%
비용−$37$10k의 0.366% · 테이커 + 슬리피지, 진입·청산 포함
가격과 펀딩비
1h · 자체 내역진입 / 청산
가격 스프레드
가격
펀딩비8시간당
진입 / 청산 · 7D
현재 진입—
진입 평균—
최고 진입—
현재 청산—
청산 평균—
최고 청산—
무비용 청산—
가격 스프레드 · 7D
현재+0.153%
평균—
범위—
현재보다 넓음—
펀딩비 스프레드 · 7D
평균 /8h—
최고—
최저—
펀딩비 수취—
최근 7D 스프레드 분포▾
수준별 시간 비율
모든 거래소의 펀딩비
/8h거래소 33곳의 ORCL
펀딩비 낮은 순진입 전 확인
정상 3 · 주의 3- 주의: 이 크기에서는 유동성 부족2.8 / 19.0 bp$10k 기준 GRVT 진입 비용은 수수료와 슬리피지를 합쳐 19.0 bp로, MEXC의 6.9배입니다.
- 참고: 최대 레버리지 시 증거금$100 + $1,000MEXC 100x, GRVT 10x. 급격한 변동에 한쪽 레그가 청산되지 않도록 이 금액의 약 2배를 준비하세요.
- 정상: 정산 주기 동일8h / 8h두 레그가 동시에 정산됩니다.현재 요율 기준, 레그당 $10k, 향후 24시간: $0.00MEXC 롱: 정산 3회, $0.00; GRVT 숏: 정산 3회, $0.00.
- 정상: 진입 스프레드 유리+0.153% vs +0.004%더 비싼 레그를 숏합니다. 스프레드가 평균으로 돌아가면 숏에서 수익이 납니다.
- 주의: 숏 레그 유동성이 더 얕음$2K vs $5.1M OI청산 비용은 GRVT에서 결정됩니다. 청산 전에 오더북을 확인하세요.
- 정상: 포인트 적립 레그 있음GRVT 포인트여기서 발생한 거래량은 포인트 프로그램에 반영됩니다.
- 주의: KYCMEXC 필요 · GRVT 불필요2026년 2월부터 거래 전 KYC가 필요합니다. 미인증 계정은 시세 데이터만 볼 수 있습니다.
수익 계산기
두 레그, 진입·청산 포함레그당 포지션보유 기간주문 유형가격 스프레드펀딩비
펀딩비 수익−0.0018%/8h × 21개 주기−$3.80
가격 스프레드+0.153% → +0.004% (7일 평균)+$14.95
슬리피지, 주문 4건실시간 오더북−$23.58
MEXC 수수료 bp × 주문 2건−$4.00
GRVT 수수료 bp × 주문 2건−$9.00
순수익 · 7일 · $10k−$25.43
회수할 비용0.366%손익분기이 요율로는 불가
슬리피지: MEXC: 실시간 오더북, 5분 전; GRVT: 실시간 오더북, 55분 전진입 비용
테이커 + 중간가 기준 슬리피지, 편도매수 · 롱MEXC0.762.8 bp−$34.4 bp−$4411.5 bp−$1,154213.9 bp−$106.9K
매도 · 숏GRVT1.8919.0 bp−$1931.0 bp−$310수용 불가수용 불가
청산할 때도 비슷한 비용이 한 번 더 듭니다.
| 10-27 16:55 | Kalshi | 기타 | JUST IN: Oracle to offer Google TPUs in its cloud for the first time X의 @Kalshi ↗ |
| 10-27 06:49 | Hyperliquid | 기타 | As a reminder, hyperps do not rely on any external data for the oracle price. Hyperps trade like perpetual contracts that users are familiar with, but do not require an external spot or index oracle price. Instead, the funding rate is determined relative to a moving average of the hyperp mark price. This makes the hyperp price more stable and less susceptible to manipulation, unlike usual pre-launch futures. When trading hyperps, funding rates are important to consider. If there is heavy price momentum in one direction, funding will heavily incentivize positions in the opposite direction for the next eight hours. As always, be sure to understand the contract before trading. Trading is on low leverage and isolated margin only. Beware of low liquidity, high volatility, potentially extreme funding, and increased liquidation risk. Note: XTEN-USDC will convert to a vanilla perp upon CEX listing. See Docs for more. XTEN-USDC is a hyperp contract that poses higher than normal risk. Do not trade contracts you are unfamiliar with and do not understand the risks for. Read the Docs to learn more about the hyperp mechanism and how it differs from vanilla perps. NFA. X의 @HyperliquidX ↗ |
| 10-25 09:09 | AZverse | 상장 | 신규 마켓 orcl_usdt ($ORCL) 수집기가 확인 |
| 10-23 04:20 | tradeXYZ | 기타 | JIO references 1 equity share of Jio Platforms Limited, quoted in USD. JIO is currently a pre-IPO market reflecting the anticipated share price; it is expected to convert to a standard XYZ perpetual upon the IPO. After the IPO, the oracle will convert the underlying stock's INR price to USD at the prevailing USD/INR FX rate. Jio Platforms provides digital connectivity and digital services in India. X의 @tradexyz ↗ |
| 10-19 22:35 | Paragon | 상장 | para:PAPER has been halted and settled. The @papertrade_xyz launch plan, published October 1, included a phase in which PAPER would become transferable. para:PAPER was listed as a pre-launch perp on that basis, with the expectation that it would convert to a standard perp once a spot market became available. Papertrade announced today that they do not intend to make $PAPER transferable. The pre-launch perp relied on the expectation that its underlying will eventually trade. Traders took positions based on a public roadmap that supported that expectation. With it removed, there is no future spot price for the market to converge to. We halted para at 22:31:15 UTC immediately following the announcement rather than schedule a later closure. This established a common cutoff for all open positions and a consistent basis for settlement, limiting the impact of trading around the announcement. All open positions were settled at $0.026296, calculated as the time-weighted average oracle price over the hour ending at the halt, using the same one-hour averaging window as Hyperliquid’s validator-led delistings for HyperCore perps. All open orders were cancelled. Remaining margin has been released, and realized PnL is reflected in account balances. No action is required from traders. Should PAPER’s transferability plans change, we will review whether the market can be unhalted. X의 @tradeparagon ↗ |
| 10-18 14:56 | Injective | 토큰 | This month, we released the new Injective Whitepaper, our first full rewrite since the original paper in December 2018. Back then we described a front-running-resistant exchange protocol on Ethereum. Injective is now a layer-1 built for institutional finance and tokenization, and the new paper covers how the entire chain works to issue real-world assets and make them usable across markets, apps and AI agents. What's inside: → Native RWA tokenization with role-based permissions over mint, send, receive and burn, plus receive hooks and sealable namespaces → iAssets, stablecoin-margined derivatives priced by oracles that track external assets without wrapping or pre-funding → A fully onchain orderbook that runs a sealed batch auction every block at one clearing price, so front-running and ordering MEV don't work → BFT consensus with a >2/3 commit threshold and deterministic finality in ~600ms → EVM and WASM sharing one state, with the MultiVM Token Standard keeping a single balance per asset that Solidity reads through precompiles → Perps with time-weighted funding, initial and maintenance margin checks, reduce-only liquidations and insurance funds → AI agents trading tokenized assets through MCP servers, policy-bounded signing and x402 payments in USDC → Onchain protocol revenue going to the Community BuyBack for $INJ every month with deflationary mechanisms built in We also formalized the mathematical reasoning behind each of these parameters, including the consensus threshold, batch clearing rule, oracle accounting, margin checks, permission model and dynamic issuance. Full paper below 👇 X의 @injective ↗ |


Kalshi
Hyperliquid
tradeXYZ
Paragon
Injective